About trailm3

Chauffer, personal assistant, teacher, short order cook, doctor, mediator, defense attorney, judge and jury, psychiatrist, dreamer of trail running, housekeeper, finder of lost things, mender of broken things, child advocate, zookeeper and mother of three trying to make a great life for my family in this unique little town.

Los Alamos Regional Bike Trail Planning Event!

Below is an invitation from Lucy Gent Foma, who is a transportation specialist on loan from the National Parks Foundation to Bandelier National Monument.
Bandelier is leading an effort to try to develop a 25 mile (or so) paved bike loop around Los Alamos.  It would be great if we could get representatives of the community recreational user groups in from the ground floor.If you are interested, please consider attending.  You can RSVP directly to Lucy.

Opera on The Rocks-Opera at Bandelier This Saturday, September 21st!

Saturday, September 21
5 p.m. to 9 p.m.
Los Alamos Guild-Opera on the Rocks
Further details and registration information
Contact: Claudia Brookshire
Park Ranger (Interpretation)
505-672-3861 x 512
                     Opera on the Rocks – Opera at Bandelier

                   presented by the Los Alamos Opera Guild
and other Los Alamos organizations;
 Bandelier National Monument
This second annual event is an opportunity for those not familiar with opera to participate in an introductory experience, as well as for opera aficionados to enjoy listening in a special venue.  The performance will be held in the evening, as the sun sets, at the Monument’s amphitheater. Those camping at the Juniper Campground may attend with no additional cost beyond the regular Bandelier fees – no opera ticket or reservation is required. Please bring your blankets and come enjoy an evening of fellowship and live music under the stars.

* Complimentary wine tasting hosted by the Don Quixote Distillery & Winery and Black Mesa Winery; glasses and bottles will be available for purchase.  Sandwiches and cheese plates will also be available to purchase.
* 6:15 p.m. performance of Menotti’s Amahl and the Night Visitors by Opera Alta.

Due to capacity issues, all attendees must utilize the free shuttle service from either the White Rock Visitor Center in White Rock, or Sullivan Field in Los Alamos.  Shuttles will depart at 5 p.m. for the Opera at Bandelier.


Los Alamos Education Update

An update from Susan O’Leary…
Hi Everyone, lots going on with Los Alamos education.  Here’s an update:
1.  IMPORTANT!  LAPS is hosting a reception this Wednesday, 9/11, 4-4:45pm at the high school with special guest New Mexico Secretary of Education Hanna Skandera.  This is a GREAT opportunity to let the Secretary know your concerns about funding for Los Alamos schools.  The reception is open to the public.   We think Secretary Skandera is the key person who could change the way the NM Public Education Department interprets the rules so that counties would be allowed to supplement the state provided education funding for operations.
2.  Several parents met with Dr. Schmidt and Gerry Washburn last week to discuss the class size issue at Mountain.  The administration said there’s nothing they can do this year about the second grade situation; if the numbers at Mountain hold next year, they’ll add back the teacher for Mountain kids in their third grade year.  I think they’re willing to do this because they think they can go down a kindergarten teacher next year.  They aren’t planning on adding back a teacher at Aspen or Barranca because they say the numbers do not support it.  The administration is planning on announcing all this in the very near future (if they haven’t already).
3.  LAPS administration said they will release to the public a 5 year forecast that shows the implications of expected funding on the delivery of school services.  This forecast will be based on a lot of assumptions but it’s the best indicator we’ll have to understanding the funding situation and how it will impact our children’s school experience.   John Wolfe, LAPS CFO said it would be ready sometime this week.
4.  Assuming the financial situation is as serious as we’ve been told, we plan to start up a community organization that seeks to educate the community about the issues and develop an action plan to resolve them.  We want to get reliable information out about the situation so the community can evaluate it constructively and in a fact-based manner.  This group will want to work with LAPS and the County to achieve optimal results for the community.  We are calling this group Save Our Schools Los Alamos and are building a website to post information athttp://www.soslosalamos.com/.  The website should be up within a week.  Let me know if you have time to help with this.  We need help in generating good analysis and research on relevant topics.  More to come on this.
3.   Tim and I were invited to meet with County officials and Council Chair Rodgers and Council Vice Chair Israelevitz last week after our editorial published asking the County to help with the funding crisis.  They’re open to considering ways that the County can help.  They encouraged us to find other Counties in New Mexico to work with if we decide to try to change State legislation or policy.  The County is also interested in learning whether LAPS can raise more funds through the lease program.  They appreciate the importance of the issue to the community while also being concerned about doing anything that would negatively impact the situation.  We agreed to meet in a few weeks after both groups have time to do more research.  More to come on this.
Let me know if you would like to talk directly about any of this.  My cell is 910-465-6719.  We are most eager to see the 5 year forecast to better understand the situation and will be in touch soon about next steps.  Thanks very much for your interest.  We’re optimistic that by working together, we can reverse the decline in funding for Los Alamos Schools.  Feel free to forward this to others as appropriate.  Susan O’Leary

A letter concerning Los Alamos school funding

Los Alamos School Funding Requires Action
Long-time Los Alamos School Board member Kevin Honnell was recently quoted as saying: “This (school) district, financially, is headed toward an iceberg like the Titanic.” The observation was made in connection with a discussion about class size, but Dr. Honnell correctly pointed out that the issue is much broader, and it is pressing.
Because of the way in which New Mexico funds K-12 education, our Los Alamos schools don’t have the funding profile, moving forward, to support the quality schools we have come to expect, and which our community can afford. Decades ago, with the very positive aim of improving education for our state’s poorest areas, the formula for educational funding was revised to pool all resources state-wide, and distribute them evenly across the state. This approach is taken in several forms in several states.
While we strongly support and are willing to pay toward better K-12 education across the state, the dark side of equalization funding in New Mexico is that beyond providing minimal funding for all our state’s school districts, New Mexico takes the punitive hard-line position that wealthier districts are PROHIBITED from spending more on education than the formula provides. Educational equalization laws with this draconian feature are often called “Envy Laws”, because they prevent communities that value education and are willing to commit discretionary resource to it from doing so.
When New Mexico’s educational envy law was introduced, Los Alamos filed suit for relief, requesting to spend more on education than the system allowed. Los Alamos lost in court, with the court finding not that the law was reasonable or even good policy; but simply that the Governor and Legislature had the legitimate authority to enact it. In the wake of that courtroom loss, generations of community leaders have worked to creatively bridge the gap between our community’s high expectations for education and the declining resources available from the New Mexico funding pool.
First, the School District has become an enterprise, generating revenue from the lease of excess property, and that has helped to some extent. Second, community leaders were successful in arguing that quality public schools in Los Alamos were critical for recruiting and retention of the key scientific, technical, engineering, and management personnel needed to sustain the National Security Laboratory. Those arguments led to a special federal law that transfers a significant, fixed sum to the Los Alamos Schools each year, but without inflation adjustment.
These initiatives and actions by our community leaders stand as major accomplishments that merit recognition. But while this approach has sustained the quality of our schools to date, this approach has resulted in some very negative outcomes, and the approach does not provide a sustainable path forward.
As members of the community who considers quality education the unquestioned paramount priority for our local government, the aspect of this situation we find most bizarre is that state law results in a top priority being resource starved, while our non-educational county programs have floated on the rising tide of prosperity. We look forward to the renewed Ashley Pond; we’re sure the improved golf course will be great; Without a doubt, the new municipal building is splendid; and we’re delighted that many of the county employees who serve our peaceful village of 18,000 earn as much or significantly more than their counterparts who perform those duties for Albuquerque, or even in state-wide capacities. Our concern is that when it comes to our schools and its employees, we are suddenly poor.
Our sense is that Los Alamos has a strong cultural commitment to education. To us, the elements of that commitment should materialize through: low student-to-teacher ratios; extraordinary opportunities for student academic, cultural, and athletic enrichment; outstanding services for our student with special needs and special gifts; and, staff enrichment and compensation benchmarked to the most successful school districts in our nation, rather than to the New Mexico average. The State of New Mexico should embrace, rather than envy and obstruct those objectives. We would have those elements for all the schools in New Mexico, but if we can’t; we would still have them here.
We find it unacceptable that class sizes are rising, that enrichment programs are endangered, that special needs and gifted programs compete with funding for mainstream students, and that school staff are second-tier county employees, with classified staff earning significantly lower compensation than their direct peers in county positions, and with our most highly educated, creative, and effective teachers making less than low level county staff.
As the federal government has recognized, quality schools for Los Alamos are important to the health of the Laboratory. Consider that the skill set needed to operate and support the Laboratory is held by well under 1% of the population; and that the people holding those skills can find good work in any number of industries and locations. Then, for our particular circumstances, reduce that pool of prospective staff to reflect that not every highly skilled person can qualify for a high-level security clearance. Then, reduce it again to reflect that many people would prefer not to have a job that subjects them to the scrutiny that goes with maintaining a security clearance. Then, reduce our candidate pool again to drop out those who object to working in national security for ideological reasons. Further, cut our pool to drop those who wish public credit and publication rights for their work, which are often restricted here. Then, shrink the candidate pool yet again to reflect those who are mindful of limited professional opportunities for a trailing spouse. Then, drop off the people who enjoy living in large metropolitan areas, or even those who just value diverse shopping and entertainment opportunities. What we have left is a tiny fraction of a miniscule pool of well qualified people who enjoy living in a safe, scenic, accomplished village with good public schools and abundant alpine recreational opportunities. For very many of us, quality public schools are the defining element that settle the question of whether Los Alamos is a good place, or a bad place for our families.
We see two opportunities for addressing this question.
First, our County Council should act immediately to absorb all possible costs that are now being borne by the school department; up to the absolute limit of discretion under current state law. Some progress has been made in this area, but much more can be done. School nurses could become county EMT or Health employees, materials and subscriptions for school libraries could become satellites of the of the county-funded library collection, school facilities and administrative functions could be taken over by the county and leased back to the schools on favorable terms, and school grounds could be subsumed by the county parks department. This avenue should be immediately and exhaustively pursued.
Second, our community should work though the Legislature and the Governor to amend the envy laws, so that local communities can override caps on educational spending by referendum, if they so choose. This type of “Home Rule” relief valve provision is common in states with funding cap laws, and is very often exercised year-in and year-out as an expression of local rights by communities that expect more services and that are willing to pay for them.
As the Governor and Legislature consistently recognize, Los Alamos is an engine for prosperity, regional growth and philanthropy in Northern New Mexico. Strong public schools, to our community standards, are central to the health of the golden goose that we are. It is not unreasonable to ask the state to let us spend our money on our priorities.
Tim and Susan O’Leary
Los Alamos

My mother always said you can’t go back. you can actually, it’s just that you probably shouldn’t.

I just got back from Washington DC this past week.  My husband and I moved our family from Chevy Chase, Maryland (an area right outside DC) to Los Alamos a little over 5 years ago.  We had taken the trip back to visit our family and old friends.  Every time we go back it is really emotionally hard.  Our best friends are the neighbors we had in this great little neighborhood we lived in, so we pretty much spent our visit there playing in our old backyard, looking at what we had left.  It was like going back in time, but someone else had taken our place and home and life.

When we moved in late 2007, I was so tired of DC that I would have gone anywhere, just to get away from there.  There’s a song that goes something like ‘this city makes us crazy and we must get out’… I think that song was stuck in my head for the last three years I lived there.

I was tired of the traffic, the crime,  paying an enormous amount of money for private school where I was also paying an enormous amount in property and county taxes.  I was done with the atmosphere of self importance, that nothing else mattered outside of what was happening in Washington.  I was sick of the feeling that I needed to keep up with the Jones’, that my house was not big enough, my car wasn’t new enough or worst of all, that someone else’s kids might be getting a better education than mine if I didn’t pay enough or live in the right zip code.  I was sick of the mosquitoes.

Anyway, we went back to visit and from the moment we got there I missed it all!  I wanted it all back! (except the mosquitoes) I was like a crazy person…I loved having every store and restaurant right at my fingertips!  I loved the traffic, the noise, the crowds, the constant sound of sirens…EVERYTHING!  I especially missed my friends, who took us in as if we had only been gone a couple of weeks.  Even my kids were moping around when it was time to pack up and come home.  It was depressing.  My husband was the only one that was rational about the whole thing.  I think he thought we were all nuts.  I can tell because he was so kind and understanding to us, he didn’t tell us we were being crazy (like how you would act to a real crazy person).  He actually didn’t ridicule me when I made him drive around looking for houses for sale.  It was bad.

So, the only little rational cell in my brain said “wait until you get home, see what it’s like to go back to Los Alamos, you might be just a little emotional right now.”  I agreed reluctantly.

I’m rambling, so I won’t go in to what a sad trip home it was, but I just want to get to the point of this long story…

An incredible thing happened!

It was great to be back!

My kids were happy to be back to school and their friends, (my youngest was just happy to be back to his train table…he’s easy to please) I was happy to be back to these wide open spaces, these trails, my home, my friends, no humidity, no mosquitoes.

No really, it all came back to me why I love Los Alamos.

It’s not a city.  It’s a town.

We moved here because we wanted a town.  And we found one that is truly special.

Where else can you find a place with, I’m going to make a list here:

  • incredible outdoor resources (we have miles and miles of incredible trails and a ski area people!)
  • an historically and culturally important past
  • International diversity
  • outstanding science and research, and the incredible people who are a part of that
  • virtually no crime!!!!
  • great schools and county services and yet such low taxes (for anyone who’s lived in a big city with high taxes and poor services and lots of crime, you know what I’m talking about!)

Where else would you find all these things and still be able to live a small town life?

On more than one occasion I have driven my kids to school in my pajamas.  My worst fear is that I will get a ticket and be listed in the Monitor’s Police Beat as the lady in her nightgown who failed to signal her turn.  I can’t go to Smith’s without seeing at least 3 people I know.  That means I definitely can’t run to the grocery store some of the days I drop my kids off at school.

I hope I don’t forget what I love about Los Alamos.  I want things for this town.  More restaurants, businesses, a rec center, my list is long.  But I hope I keep reminding myself what I don’t want for Los Alamos.  I don’t want it to be a city.

School board meeting tonight

I’m re-posting this from Susan about tonight’s meeting. Thanks Susan!!!

It looks like the consolidation of Mountain second grade classes from three to two (which means class sizes of at least 26, possibly more) is in effect, despite a number of parents reaching out to Dr. Schmidt and Gerry Washburn in the past week. For perspective, NEA recommends class sizes of 15 for K-3. Today, Tuesday Aug 13, there’s a School Board Meeting at 5:30 at the high school speech theater which is apparently located near the gym. Public Comment is early on the agenda and should occur shortly after the meeting starts. This is a good opportunity to voice concerns about class size, not only at Mountain but also at Barranca and Aspen, which also has large class sizes this year in second grade. The Administration and School Board are dealing with a tough budget year. If they know that parents (lots of parents) are concerned about class size, it could help them realize that smaller class sizes for elementary education is a priority for our community — and encourage them to find other ways to deal with their budget issues.

usable art


usable art

More good ideas for Art in Public Places. This from Ft. Collins.

Pajarito Ski Area

The Ski Club is talking with the County about ways to partner — the Ski Club wants water and needs more income, and the County wants economic development opportunities.  The main reason the Ski Club is talking with the County now is because the Ski Club’s finances, and the viability of the ski hill under the current business model, are not good.  The County would like to hire a consulting firm (at no cost to the Ski Club) to evaluate opportunities to further a partnership between the Ski Club and the County, to include options to increase activities on the hill, help to bring potable and non-potable water up to the hill, and other ways to help the local economy through development at the ski hill.  Before the County spends money on the consultants, they want assurances from the Ski Club that the club membership is willing to consider options — they don’t want to spend money evaluating options and then have ski club membership say no to any change.
So, the Ski Club will be sending out a ballot via mail to all Ski Club members (if you bought a season pass last year, you are still a member and will receive a ballot) asking for permission to move forward with the County in hiring a consultant to evaluate options.  Essentially, this vote needs to indicate that Ski Club membership is willing to consider new ideas.  The Board wants a majority of voters to support moving the discussion with the County forward before it gives the County the green light to proceed.
It is really important that you return the ballot and support the request.  (Believe it or not, there are some people who think the Ski Hill doesn’t need to change even though it is facing bankruptcy if it does nothing.)  It doesn’t bind the Ski Club in any way and it will give us all an opportunity to consider ways to make Pajarito an even better place for our families for the long term.  If there are opportunities identified by the consultants, Ski Club membership will have to approve them before anything would actually change or happen in the long run.  I personally think there are many ways that additional activities could be added to the hill (i.e. summer camps, more skiing programs for kids, etc.) that would be big benefits to us without significantly changing the culture and geography of the ski hill.
Please forward this information to other Ski Club members and encourage them to return the ballot, voting yes.  If you are not a current member, please consider buying a season pass to become one and at the same time, support and enjoy one of our important outdoor resources.
Thanks for considering this information.

in which I try to plead my case for some fun places for kids near a coffee shop so I can relax while they entertain themselves…

Now that Ashley Pond is getting her big makeover, I keep thinking about how great it would be to use some of our county funds allocated for Art in Public Places to create something around the pond for our kids to enjoy for years to come.  the common idea I hear from a lot of moms is a fountain or splash pad…


What about a climbing structure, like the great ones on Pearl Street in Boulder?images

Or the cool one in Buena Vista? (I bet a few adults in this town would enjoy that one!)


There are so many great ideas for interactive art that goes beyond the typical bronze statue that reminds us of our past.

My kids always loved The Awakening when it was in DC near the Tidal Basin.Joel_TheAwakening

and we love the Railyard Park in Santa Fe, and how naturally it fits into the area (The guy sleeping in the tunnel with his guitar at 10am during the week we could do without, but hey, it’s just another great reminder of why we love Los Alamos!)


Anyway, I know we have money for art in Los Alamos, but how about spending that on something we could use and keep enjoying over time?  The thought of another statue that a tourist might stop by once to stand next to, and something my family might notice once, doesn’t seem like that great of an idea in a place where those resources could make this a much more family friendly area.